Side by side
Geonode vs PacketStream
The short answer
On residential, Geonode is the cheaper of the two at $0.27/GB against PacketStream's $1/GB, a gap of about 73%. One thing to read before you decide: we carry a warning on PacketStream and none on Geonode.
Sign-up
Just an email
Just an email
Pay with
Card, crypto
Card
Free trial
$7 for 7 days
None
IPs (their number)
2 million
7 million
Countries
140
190
Won't work for
Nothing we know of
Streaming
Warnings
None
Gets its IPs from paid volunteers
Geonode against PacketStream, product by product
Residentialcompared above
$0.27/GBon 100 TB, $27,000/mo, read 12 Augfrom $7.92/mo on 10 GB, 25 plans
$1.00/GBon Residential Proxies, read 12 Aug1 plan
Fixed ISP
—priced per IP addressfrom $5.25/mo on 3 IPs, 11 plans
Does not sell this
Datacenter
$0.14/GBon 100 TB, $14,400/mo, read 12 Augfrom $4.77/mo on 10 GB, 21 plans
Does not sell this
Choose Geonode if
the rate is lower, $0.27/GB against $1, and we carry no warning on Geonode and one on PacketStream: gets its ips from paid volunteers.
Choose PacketStream if
the country list is wider, 190 against 140.
Questions
Does Geonode or PacketStream ask for ID?
Both ask for the same thing: just an email.
Which is cheaper, Geonode or PacketStream?
Geonode, at $0.27 per GB against PacketStream's $1 per GB, both residential rates read from the providers' own pages and dated above.
Which has more addresses, Geonode or PacketStream?
PacketStream, on their own numbers: 7 million, 190 countries against Geonode's 2 million, 140 countries.
Neither of these?
We don't pick a winner, the numbers are the same ones on each provider's page, checked yesterday.